78 | 2025 Cal-Peculiarities ©2025 Seyfarth Shaw LLP www.seyfarth.com 32 Id. at ch. 8.300.050 (G). 33 Id. at ch. 8.300.050(I)(1)(b). 34 Id. at ch. 8.300.050(I)(2)-(3). 35 Id. at ch. 8.300.050(J). 36 Id. at ch. 8.300.050(K). 37 Id. at ch. 8.300.050(K)(6). 38 Id. at ch. 8.300.080. 39 Id. at ch. 8.300.100. 40 Id. at ch. 8.300.110. 41 Los Angeles, Mun. Code, Art. 9, Ch. 18, § 189 et seq. Under the Los Angeles Fair Chance Initiative for Hiring, the definition of “employee” extends to those individuals who are working an average of two hours per week within the geographic limits of Los Angeles, even if those two hours are telecommuting from an LA address. Id. § 189.01(I). 42 See https://bca.lacity.org/fair-chance (last visited Mar. 30, 2025). The assessment/reassessment form is found at https://bca.lacity.gov/Uploads/fciho/Ban%20the%20Box%20Individual%20Assessment%20and%20Reassessment%202.1.22%20fillable.p df (last visited Mar. 30, 2025). 43 See San Diego Cty. Code §§ 21.2701 - .2708. 44 Id. 45 Lab. Code § 432.2. 46 Health & Safety Code § 120980(f) (“Except as [used for insurance risk purposes], the results of an HIV test, as defined in subdivision (c) of section 120775, that identifies or provides identifying characteristics of the person to whom the test results apply, shall not be used in any instance for the determination of insurability or suitability for employment.”). 47 Gov’t Code § 12940(o). 48 Penal Code § 632. 49 Penal Code § 637.2. 50 Penal Code § 632(d). People v. Guzman, 8 Cal. 5th 673, 677 (2019) (“Within the context of defendant’s criminal trial, the recording in this case was relevant evidence. By the express terms of the Right to Truth-in-Evidence provision, therefore, the recording could ‘not be excluded.’”) (quoting Cal. Const. Art. I, § 28(f)(2)). 51 Lab. Code § 435. 52 Hernandez v. Hillsides, Inc., 47 Cal. 4th 272 (2009). 53 Id. at 277. 54 Id. at 300-301. 55 Sanders v. Am. Broad. Co., 20 Cal. 4th 907, 923 (1999) (employees talking around a cubicle could sue ABC news crew for surreptitiously videotaping). 56 Civ. Code § 56.20(a). 57 Civ. Code § 56.20(c). 58 Civ. Code § 56.20(b). 59 AB 1697, 2023 bill amending Civ. Code §§ 56.11, 56.21. 60 Lab. Code § 3762(c). 61 Civ. Code § 1798.85(a)(1)-(2), (4)-(5). 62 Civ. Code § 1798.85(a)(3). 63 Civ. Code § 1798.81.5(b). 64 Civ. Code § 1798.81.5(c). 65 Lab. Code § 980(a). 66 Lab. Code § 980(b)(1)-(3). 67 Lab. Code § 980(e). 68 Lab. Code § 980(c). 69 Lab. Code § 980(d). 70 Ignat v. Yum! Brands, Inc., 214 Cal. App. 4th 808, 819 (2013) (“limiting liability for public disclosure of private facts to those recorded in a writing is contrary to the tort’s purpose, which has been since its inception to allow a person to control the kind of information about himself made available to the public—in essence, to define his public persona”). 71 Civ. Code §§ 1798.100(e); 1798.81.5(b), (d)(1)(A). 72 Civ. Code § 1798.150(a)(1)(A).
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy OTkwMTQ4